Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$3.00$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$1.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.30$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Write (per 1M)$3.75N/A Claude Sonnet 4.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 93% cheaper overall.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Providers

Amazon Bedrock $3.00 (Cheapest)
Google $3.00 (Cheapest)
Anthropic $3.00 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

DeepInfra $0.22 (Cheapest)
Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
5
Claude Sonnet 4.5 Wins
1
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
37.124.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
33.524.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
37.039.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.078.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
72.761.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
59.058.5
AIME
Competition math
-47.7-
Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Claude Sonnet 4.5
1,000,000
tokens
Max output: 64,000 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 74% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second70.4 tok/s39.3 tok/s
Time to First Token1.07s1.63s
Claude Sonnet 4.5 responds 79% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorAnthropicQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2025

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.5 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 33.5, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.