Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6MiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6MiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicMinimax
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to MiniMax M2.7's score of 41.9.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.