Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Qwen
Qwen

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context Window
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduQwen
ReleasedOct 2025Oct 2024

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.