Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Qwen
Qwen

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B wins:

  • Larger context window

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context Window
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2024

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has a 120,000 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.