Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Qwen
Qwen

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3BQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3BQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.56/M tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has a 30,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.