Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Seed 1.6 Flash vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Seed 1.6 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Seed 1.6 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 1.6 FlashGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 1.6 FlashGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorBytedance-seedOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Feb 2026

Seed 1.6 Flash Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Seed 1.6 Flash with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Seed 1.6 Flash's score of N/A.
Seed 1.6 Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.