Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepcogitoQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper input pricing at $0.18/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper output pricing at $0.59/M tokens.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.