Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Qwen
Qwen

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

114 out of our 303 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.22 DeepSeek V3.1
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.75$1.00 DeepSeek V3.1
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.1 is 28% cheaper overall.

DeepSeek V3.1 Providers

Chutes $0.20 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.21
SiliconFlow $0.27
Novita $0.27
AtlasCloud $0.30

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

DeepInfra $0.22 (Cheapest)
Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
5
DeepSeek V3.1 Wins
1
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
28.124.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
28.424.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
49.739.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
83.378.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
73.561.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
57.758.5
AIME
Competition math
-47.7-
DeepSeek V3.1 shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
DeepSeek V3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

DeepSeek V3.1
32,768
tokens
Max output: 7,168 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s39.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s1.63s
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3.1 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.