Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 1.0 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 1.0 ProQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Gemini 1.0 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

See all model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 1.0 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Gemini 1.0 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $0.38/M tokens.
Gemini 1.0 Pro has a 32,760 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 1.0 Pro supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.

Built by @aellman

Archive
Follow us:
Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026 68 Ventures, LLC. All rights reserved.