Key Takeaways
Gemini 1.0 Pro wins:
- No clear advantages in compared metrics
Qwen3.5 9B wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Cheaper output tokens
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
N/A
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 9B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.13 | $0.10 | Qwen3.5 9B |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.38 | $0.15 | Qwen3.5 9B |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3.5 9B is 40% cheaper overall.
Gemini 1.0 Pro Providers
No provider data available
Qwen3.5 9B Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 1.0 Pro Wins
2
Qwen3.5 9B Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 9B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | 8.5 | 32.4 | |
Coding Index Code generation & understanding | - | 25.3 | - |
MMLU Pro Academic knowledge | 43.1 | - | - |
GPQA Graduate-level science | 27.7 | 80.6 | |
LiveCodeBench Competitive programming | 11.6 | - | - |
AIME Competition math | 0.7 | - | - |
Qwen3.5 9B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
Gemini 1.0 Pro
N/A
tokens
Qwen3.5 9B
N/A
tokens
Speed Performance
| Metric | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 9B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens/second | 0.0 tok/s | 0.0 tok/s | |
| Time to First Token | 0.00s | 0.00s |
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 9B |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Author | Qwen |
Gemini 1.0 Pro Modalities
Input
Output
Qwen3.5 9B Modalities
Input
Output