Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context Window
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Speed
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash LiteQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 58% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Providers

Google AI Studio $0.07 (Cheapest)
Google $0.07 (Cheapest)

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash LiteQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.735.2
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.436.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
53.55.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
18.5--
AIME
Competition math
27.7--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins 2 out of 6 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 8,192 tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.0 Flash LiteQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.00sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.0 Flash LiteQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.0 Flash LiteQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedFeb 2025Oct 2024

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.