Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemini 3 Pro PreviewWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$2.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$12.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00$200000.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00$375000.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) is 81% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Providers

Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Providers

Google AI Studio $2.00 (Cheapest)
Google $2.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Wins
0
Gemini 3 Pro Preview Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemini 3 Pro PreviewWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-48.4-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-46.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-95.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-89.8-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-90.8-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-91.7-
Gemini 3 Pro Preview significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 97% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemini 3 Pro PreviewWinner
Tokens/secondN/A132.8 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A30.65s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemini 3 Pro Preview
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedOct 2025Nov 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) with:

Compare Gemini 3 Pro Preview with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper output pricing at $2.50/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 46.5, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)'s score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision. Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision.