Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs Gemini 3 Pro Preview

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemini 3 Pro Preview
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedOct 2025Nov 2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper output pricing at $2.50/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision. Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision.