Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemma 2 27BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.30$0.65 Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.65 Gemma 2 27B
Cache Read (per 1M)$30000.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 2 27B is 24% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Providers

Google AI Studio $0.30 (Cheapest)
Google $0.30 (Cheapest)

Gemma 2 27B Providers

NextBit $0.65 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

5
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Wins
0
Gemma 2 27B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemma 2 27BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-36.2-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-38.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-16.7-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-36.1-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-49.3-
Both models show comparable benchmark performance.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Gemma 2 27B
8,192
tokens
Max output: 2,048 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

Speed benchmarks not available for these models

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) with:

Compare Gemma 2 27B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Gemma 2 27B's score of N/A.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision. Gemma 2 27B does not support vision.