Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs Gemma 2 27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemma 2 27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)Gemma 2 27B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2024

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) supports vision. Gemma 2 27B supports vision.