Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Z-ai

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
GLM-5 Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana)GLM-5 Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleZ-ai
ReleasedOct 2025Mar 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
imagetext

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has cheaper output pricing at $2.50/M tokens.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (Nano Banana) has a 32,768 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.