Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder Next
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Speed
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.07 Qwen3 Coder Next
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.30 Qwen3 Coder Next
Cache Read (per 1M)$10000.00$35000.00 Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Cache Write (per 1M)$83300.00N/A Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder Next is 27% cheaper overall.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Providers

Google AI Studio $0.10 (Cheapest)
Google $0.10 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder Next Providers

Chutes $0.07 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.15
Novita $0.20
Together $0.50

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Wins
3
Qwen3 Coder Next Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.528.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
7.422.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
35.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
72.4--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
47.473.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.0--
AIME
Competition math
50.0--
Qwen3 Coder Next significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite
1,048,576
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder NextWinner
Tokens/second248.0 tok/s124.3 tok/s
Time to First Token0.28s0.81s
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite responds 99% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash LiteQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder Next with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 22.9, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite's score of 7.4.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.