Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 Modalities

Input
textimageaudiovideo
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025's score of 22.1.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.