Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3 Pro PreviewKimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3 Pro PreviewKimi K2 0905 (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleMoonshotai
ReleasedNov 2025Sep 2025

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 46.5, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision.