Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Context Window
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Speed
Gemini 3 Pro Preview

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3 Pro PreviewQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3 Pro PreviewQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2025

Gemini 3 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
textimagefileaudiovideo
Output
text

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3 Pro Preview with:

Compare Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.80/M tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.80/M tokens.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 46.5, compared to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's score of N/A.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Gemini 3 Pro Preview supports vision. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports vision.