Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Xiaomi

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Modalities

Input
audiofileimagetextvideo
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview's score of N/A.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has a 1,048,576 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.