Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BGemma 4 26B A4B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BGemma 4 26B A4B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedJul 2024Apr 2026

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct supports vision.