Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 2 27B vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 27B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Speed
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 27BQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 27BQwen3.5-122B-A10B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedJul 2024Feb 2026

Gemma 2 27B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. Gemma 2 27B has cheaper output pricing at $0.65/M tokens.
Gemma 2 27B has a 8,192 token context window, while Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 2 27B supports vision. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B supports vision.