Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 2 9B vs Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2 9B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 2 9B
Context Window
Gemma 2 9B
Speed
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2 9BQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2 9BQwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedJun 2024Unknown

Gemma 2 9B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 2 9B with:

Compare Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 2 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.08/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.7, compared to Gemma 2 9B's score of N/A.
Gemma 2 9B has a 8,192 token context window, while Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) has a unknown token context window.
Gemma 2 9B supports vision. Qwen3.5 4B (Non-reasoning) does not support vision.