Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 2B vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 2B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 2B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 2BQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 2BQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Gemma 2B Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 2B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Gemma 2B has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Gemma 2B has a 8,192 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 2B does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.