Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 12B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 12B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3 12B
Context Window
Gemma 3 12B
Speed
Gemma 3 12B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGemma 3 12BQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.03$0.04 Gemma 3 12B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.10$0.10Tie
Cache Read (per 1M)$15000.00N/A Gemma 3 12B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Gemma 3 12B is 14% cheaper overall.

Gemma 3 12B Providers

Chutes $0.03 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.04
Crusoe $0.08
Cloudflare $0.35

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
2
Gemma 3 12B Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGemma 3 12BQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
8.835.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
6.3--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
18.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
59.536.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
34.95.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
13.7--
AIME
Competition math
22.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Gemma 3 12B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Gemma 3 12B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Gemma 3 12B
131,072
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Gemma 3 12B has a 75% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGemma 3 12BQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second33.6 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token11.94sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 12BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 12BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedMar 2025Oct 2024

Gemma 3 12B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 12B with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Gemma 3 12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Gemma 3 12B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 6.3, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Gemma 3 12B has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Gemma 3 12B supports vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.