Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3.5 9B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3 12B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 3 12B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Qwen3.5 9B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3 12BQwen3.5 9B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3 12BQwen3.5 9B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedMar 2025Mar 2026

Gemma 3 12B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 3 12B with:

Compare Qwen3.5 9B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3 12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Gemma 3 12B has cheaper output pricing at $0.13/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 9B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 21.4, compared to Gemma 3 12B's score of 6.3.
Gemma 3 12B has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 3 12B supports vision. Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision.