Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 3n 4B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3n 4B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Gemma 3n 4B
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 3n 4B
Context Window
Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 3n 4B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 3n 4BQwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 3n 4BQwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedMay 2025Apr 2025

Gemma 3n 4B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 3n 4B has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Gemma 3n 4B has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Gemma 3n 4B has a 32,768 token context window, while Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Gemma 3n 4B does not support vision. Qwen2.5 Coder 7B Instruct does not support vision.