Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Google
Google

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct vs Gemma 4 31B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 4 31B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 26B A4B InstructGemma 4 31B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 26B A4B InstructGemma 4 31B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorGoogleGoogle
ReleasedApr 2026Apr 2026

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct with:

Compare Gemma 4 31B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct's score of 22.4.
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 4 26B A4B Instruct supports vision. Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision.