Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder Next wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Speed
Qwen3 Coder Next

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3 Coder Next
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3 Coder Next
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedApr 2026Feb 2026

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder Next Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder Next has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Qwen3 Coder Next's score of 22.9.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder Next has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Qwen3 Coder Next does not support vision.