Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 4 31B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2025

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Gemma 4 31B Instruct with:

Compare Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's score of N/A.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking has a 128,000 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking does not support vision.