Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Speed
Gemma 4 31B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2025

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports vision.