Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Google
Google
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Gemma 4 31B Instruct vs Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Gemma 4 31B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B wins:

  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Gemma 4 31B Instruct
Context Window
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
Speed
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3.5-35B-A3B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGemma 4 31B InstructQwen3.5-35B-A3B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorGoogleQwen
ReleasedApr 2026Feb 2026

Gemma 4 31B Instruct Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. Gemma 4 31B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 38.7, compared to Qwen3.5-35B-A3B's score of 16.8.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5-35B-A3B has a 262,144 token context window.
Gemma 4 31B Instruct supports vision. Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports vision.