Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

MiniMax M2.7 vs Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxNvidia
ReleasedMar 2026Oct 2025

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL's score of 5.9.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has a 131,072 token context window.