Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron Nano 12B 2 VLGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorNvidiaOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2025Feb 2026

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL's score of 5.9.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL supports vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.