Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Minimax
Minimax
vs
Qwen
Qwen

MiniMax M2.7 vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMiniMax M2.7Qwen2.5 Coder 32B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMiniMax M2.7Qwen2.5 Coder 32B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMinimaxQwen
ReleasedMar 2026Unknown

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window, while Qwen2.5 Coder 32B has a 32,768 token context window.