Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Devstral 2 2512 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral 2 2512
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral 2 2512Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral 2 2512Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2025

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Devstral 2 2512 with:

Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Small 3.1 24B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B has cheaper output pricing at $0.11/M tokens.
Devstral 2 2512 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.7, compared to Mistral Small 3.1 24B's score of 13.9.
Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B has a 128,000 token context window.
Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision. Mistral Small 3.1 24B supports vision.