Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Devstral 2 2512 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral 2 2512
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricDevstral 2 2512Mistral Small 3.1 24BWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.03 Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.22$0.11 Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Cache Read (per 1M)$25000.00$15000.00 Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Small 3.1 24B is 46% cheaper overall.

Devstral 2 2512 Providers

Chutes $0.05 (Cheapest)
Mistral $0.40

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Providers

Chutes $0.03 (Cheapest)
Cloudflare $0.35

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
6
Devstral 2 2512 Wins
0
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkDevstral 2 2512Mistral Small 3.1 24BWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
22.014.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
23.713.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
36.73.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
76.265.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
59.445.4
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
44.821.2
AIME
Competition math
-9.3-
Devstral 2 2512 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Devstral 2 2512
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Devstral 2 2512
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
131,072
tokens
Max output: 131,072 tokens
Devstral 2 2512 has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricDevstral 2 2512Mistral Small 3.1 24BWinner
Tokens/second73.8 tok/s104.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.40s0.29s
Mistral Small 3.1 24B responds 41% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral 2 2512Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral 2 2512Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2025

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Devstral 2 2512 with:

Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Small 3.1 24B has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Mistral Small 3.1 24B has cheaper output pricing at $0.11/M tokens.
Devstral 2 2512 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.7, compared to Mistral Small 3.1 24B's score of 13.9.
Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B has a 131,072 token context window.
Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision. Mistral Small 3.1 24B supports vision.