Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Devstral 2 2512 vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral 2 2512
Context Window
Devstral 2 2512
Speed
Devstral 2 2512

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral 2 2512Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2025

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.08/M tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 32,768 token context window.
Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 does not support vision.