Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Devstral 2 2512 vs Qwen3.5 9B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Devstral 2 2512 wins:

  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen3.5 9B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5 9B
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral 2 2512
Context Window
Qwen3.5 9B
Speed
Qwen3.5 9B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral 2 2512Qwen3.5 9B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral 2 2512Qwen3.5 9B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

Devstral 2 2512 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 9B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5 9B has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen3.5 9B has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
Devstral 2 2512 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 23.7, compared to Qwen3.5 9B's score of 21.4.
Devstral 2 2512 has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen3.5 9B has a 262,144 token context window.
Devstral 2 2512 does not support vision. Qwen3.5 9B does not support vision.