Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Mistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Mistral Nemo
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2024

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.