Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Mistral Medium 3.1
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Voxtral Small 24B 2507
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2025

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 Modalities

Input
textaudio
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has a 32,000 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 does not support vision.