Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Nemo vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Mistral Small 3.1 24B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoMistral Small 3.1 24B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoMistral Small 3.1 24B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2024Mar 2025

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Small 3.1 24B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.9, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Small 3.1 24B has a 128,000 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Mistral Small 3.1 24B supports vision.