Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureVoxtral Small 24B 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyVoxtral Small 24B 2507Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIQwen
ReleasedOct 2025Feb 2026

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 Modalities

Input
textaudio
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has a 32,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.