Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Kimi K2 0711 vs Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Track Your LLM Costs Across Every Provider Broken down by user, feature, and endpoint

107 out of our 482 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0711 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricKimi K2 0711Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.55$0.40 Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.20$2.00 Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.15$0.15Tie
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) is 17% cheaper overall.

Kimi K2 0711 Providers

No provider data available

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Kimi K2 0711 Wins
3
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkKimi K2 0711Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
26.330.9
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
22.125.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
57.057.3-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
82.481.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
76.676.7-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
55.661.0
Aider
Real-world code editing
59.1--
AIME
Competition math
69.3--
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins 3 out of 8 benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Kimi K2 0711
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Kimi K2 0711
131,000
tokens
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricKimi K2 0711Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second40.4 tok/s78.4 tok/s
Time to First Token1.04s0.50s
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) responds 94% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0711Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0711Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiMoonshotai
ReleasedJul 2025Sep 2025

Kimi K2 0711 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Kimi K2 0711 with:

Compare Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.9, compared to Kimi K2 0711's score of 22.1.
Kimi K2 0711 has a 131,000 token context window, while Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Kimi K2 0711 does not support vision. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision.