Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Kimi K2 0711 vs Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0711 wins:

  • Faster response time

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
Kimi K2 0711

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0711Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0711Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiMoonshotai
ReleasedJul 2025Sep 2025

Kimi K2 0711 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.9, compared to Kimi K2 0711's score of 22.1.
Kimi K2 0711 has a 131,000 token context window, while Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Kimi K2 0711 does not support vision. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision.