Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

101 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Context Window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.05$0.04 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.20$0.10 Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 37% cheaper overall.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Providers

DeepInfra $0.05 (Cheapest)
Chutes $0.06

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Providers

Phala $0.04 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.04 (Cheapest)
Together $0.30

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
2
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Wins
1
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.335.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
15.8--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
13.3--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
57.936.5
GPQA
Graduate-level science
39.95.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
36.0--
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
-34.9-
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
262,144
tokens
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
32,768
tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen2.5 7B InstructWinner
Tokens/second178.1 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token0.25sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2024

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.8, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.