Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

116 out of our 496 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Context Window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Speed
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaQwen
ReleasedDec 2025Oct 2024

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with:

Compare Qwen2.5 7B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.8, compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's score of N/A.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision.