Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5 vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

92 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5
Context Window
GPT-5
Speed
GPT-5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.25$0.22 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$1.00 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.13$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) is 88% cheaper overall.

GPT-5 Providers

OpenAI $1.25 (Cheapest)
Azure $1.25 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
7
GPT-5 Wins
0
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
44.624.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
36.024.6
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
94.339.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
87.178.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
85.461.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
84.658.5
Aider
Real-world code editing
88.0--
AIME
Competition math
95.747.7
GPT-5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
GPT-5 has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second92.9 tok/s47.5 tok/s
Time to First Token97.82s1.64s
GPT-5 responds 96% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2025

GPT-5 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5 with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.22/M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $1.00/M tokens.
GPT-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.0, compared to Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)'s score of 24.6.
GPT-5 has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5 supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.