Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniQwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2026

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's score of 36.4.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini supports vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.