Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3 Max Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.1-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

Qwen3 Max Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3 Max ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.25$1.20 Qwen3 Max Thinking
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$6.00 Qwen3 Max Thinking
Cache Read (per 1M)$125000.00N/A GPT-5.1-Codex
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Qwen3 Max Thinking is 30% cheaper overall.

GPT-5.1-Codex Providers

OpenAI $1.25 (Cheapest)
Azure $1.25 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Max Thinking Providers

Alibaba $1.20 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-5.1-Codex Wins
0
Qwen3 Max Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3 Max ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
42.2--
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
36.6--
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
95.7--
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
86.0--
GPQA
Graduate-level science
86.0--
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
84.9--
GPT-5.1-Codex significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-5.1-Codex
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-5.1-Codex
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
Qwen3 Max Thinking
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
GPT-5.1-Codex has a 34% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3 Max ThinkingWinner
Tokens/second166.3 tok/sN/A
Time to First Token15.87sN/A

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3 Max Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.1-CodexQwen3 Max Thinking
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedNov 2025Feb 2026

GPT-5.1-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen3 Max Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-5.1-Codex with:

Compare Qwen3 Max Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3 Max Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $1.20/M tokens. Qwen3 Max Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $6.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.1-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.6, compared to Qwen3 Max Thinking's score of N/A.
GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Max Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-5.1-Codex supports vision. Qwen3 Max Thinking does not support vision.