Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-5.3 Codex vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-5.3 CodexQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-5.3 CodexQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedFeb 2026Unknown

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window, while Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K has a 131,072 token context window.
GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K does not support vision.