Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context Window
GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 7B InstructGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 7B InstructGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwen
ReleasedOct 2024Unknown

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.03/M tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has a 32,768 token context window, while GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has a 32,768 token context window.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not support vision. GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking supports vision.