Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode

Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Context Window
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Speed
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Qwen3.5 397B A17B
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedSep 2025Feb 2026

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Qwen3.5 397B A17B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) with:

Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has cheaper output pricing at $0.78/M tokens.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)'s score of N/A.
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) has a 1,000,000 token context window, while Qwen3.5 397B A17B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) does not support vision. Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports vision.