Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Qwen
Qwen
vs
Qwen
Qwen

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K vs Qwen3.5-27B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

Qwen3.5-27B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3.5-27B
Context Window
Qwen3.5-27B
Speed
Qwen3.5-27B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128KQwen3.5-27B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyQwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128KQwen3.5-27B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorQwenQwen
ReleasedUnknownFeb 2026

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K Modalities

Input
Output

Qwen3.5-27B Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Qwen3.5-27B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K has a 131,072 token context window, while Qwen3.5-27B has a 262,144 token context window.
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct 128K does not support vision. Qwen3.5-27B supports vision.